Legal Opinion

Painter Motor Co. v. Ostler

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1980No. 16598PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Plaintiffs seek review of the Industrial Commission’s order awarding workmen’s compensation benefits to defendant, Howard C. Ostler. We affirm the Commission Order. All statutory references are to Utah Code Annotated, 1953, as amended.

The defendant, Howard Ostler, hereinafter “Ostler,” was employed by Painter Motor Company as a parts manager for approximately eleven years prior to March 4, 1977. On that date, Ostler was directed by his employer to assist an electrician in the installation of electrical boxes. The job consisted of scaling a ladder and drilling holes for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carling v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Graybar Electric Co., Inc. v. Ind. Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Robertson v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Lipman v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Wiseman v. Village PartnersUtah Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MonfrediUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Sabo's Electronic Service v. SaboUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Allen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Allen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API