Calisto Mariko Wells v. State of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner Calisto Wells challenges the respondent judge’s ruling ordering him to disclose police-officer witness statements made during interviews of which the state had no notice, despite his intent to use the statements solely for impeachment. We accept special action jurisdiction to clarify that a trial court may, upon a showing of substantial need and undue hardship, order such materials disclosed. But because our record is unclear whether the state made such a showing here, we vacate the respondent judge’s order.
Background
¶…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Arizona v. RumseySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. RienhardtArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. HickmanArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Zimmerman v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Allyn Akeem SmithArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- Robertson v. AllingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- DON C. ROBERTSON v. ROBERT E. ALLING and JACQUELINE R. ALLINGCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025