Legal Opinion

Calisto Mariko Wells v. State of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 28, 2013No. 2 CA-SA 2012-0076PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner Calisto Wells challenges the respondent judge’s ruling ordering him to disclose police-officer witness statements made during interviews of which the state had no notice, despite his intent to use the statements solely for impeachment. We accept special action jurisdiction to clarify that a trial court may, upon a showing of substantial need and undue hardship, order such materials disclosed. But because our record is unclear whether the state made such a showing here, we vacate the respondent judge’s order.

Background

¶…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Arizona v. RumseySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. RienhardtArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. HickmanArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Zimmerman v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Allyn Akeem SmithArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Robertson v. AllingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. DON C. ROBERTSON v. ROBERT E. ALLING and JACQUELINE R. ALLINGCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API