Legal Opinion

Arizona v. Rumsey

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 29, 1984No. 83-226PublishedCited by 578 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

The question presented is whether the Double Jeopardy Clause prohibits the State of Arizona from sentencing respondent to death after the life sentence he had initially received was set aside on appeal. We agree with the Supreme Court of Arizona that Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U. S. 430 (1981), squarely controls the disposition of this case. Under the interpretation of the Double Jeopardy Clause adopted in that decision, imposition of the death penalty on respondent would be unconstitutional.

I

An Arizona jury convicted respondent of armed robbery and first degree murder. The trial judge, with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by578 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

573 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API