Legal Opinion

Moore v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 12, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Sampson

Affirming.. Appellant, Moore, was accused -by indictment in the Daviess circuit court of the offense of unlawfully having-in possession an illicit still, designed for the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquors. He was found guilty and his punishment fixed at a fine of $500.00 and by confinement in the county jail' four (4) months. In his motion for a new trial he sets forth eight (8) alleged reasons as follows:

“First, the court erred to the substantial rights of the defendant in overruling his motion for a directed verdict at the conclusion of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mattingly v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Adams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Head v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. Fiscal Court v. StrotherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  2. Neal v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  3. Ware v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API