Henson v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
' PALMORE, Judge.
The affidavit for the search warrant under which the incriminating evidence in this local option case was obtained stated that the defendant “now has in possession,” unlawfully, at the premises therein described a quantity of alcoholic beverages, and “that knowledge of these facts was gained in the following manner, to-wit: Observation, in person.” (Italics added.) Nowhere did it state when the personal observation took place. For this reason it is contended that the affidavit was insufficient to support the warrant.
It seems to be the general 'rule iii other jurisdictions…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Walters v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Mattingly v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Bowen v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Blackburn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Abraham v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Todd v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
- Schweinefuss v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
- Gossett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
- Johnson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- People v. BeshanyNew York Supreme Court · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.