Ware v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
HAWKINS, Judge.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing proceeds on the theory that our former opinion in effect held that the search warrant under which the officers acted was predicated on an insufficient affidavit; that if the evidence of the officers be discarded the testimony given by appellant was not sufficient to make out a case against him, and that the principle announced in the recent cases of Kelsey v. State, (No. 11188, date of opinion March 21, 1928) and King v. State, (No. 11193, date of opinion March 28, 1928) should be controlling here. In our original opinion…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chapin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Veeder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
- People v. CzckayMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Rozner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Walters v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.