Legal Opinion

Vernon v. Board of Supervisors

California Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1904No. L.A. No. 1422PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

This is a proceeding for a writ of mandamus to compel the defendant to canvass the returns of an election held for the incorporation of the town of Upland and the election of its first set of officers. Defendant had judgment, from which" plaintiff appeals.

The facts are presented by the findings and the admissions of the pleadings, and, so far as material, are as follows: The petition for the incorporation of the town, which was in due form, and signed by the requisite number of resident electors, was presented to the defendant, after due publication, at its regular meeting of March…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Graves v. McFaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Rowland v. KreyenhagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Trumpler v. TrumplerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. People v. Town of NevadaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Estey v. StarrSupreme Court of Vermont · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Borchard v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. 216 Sutter Bay Associates v. County of SutterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Doyle v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. DeWitt v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API