Legal Opinion
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 23, 1958No. Civ. 23433; Civ 23365PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE, J. pro tem. *
The first matter named in the caption involves an appeal by Consolidated Fire Protection District, hereinafter called “District,” the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles and one Keith Klinger who is the chief engineer of the District, from a judgment annulling a resolution of the board of supervisors annexing certain territory to the District in a proceeding known as Annexation 47-57.
The second matter named in the caption involves a petition by Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, a corporation, hereinafter called Firestone, for a writ of prohibition directed…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Wight v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Santa Cruz v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Flaherty v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Bookout v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- DeWitt v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Erven v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.