Legal Opinion

Surowitz v. City of Pontiac

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1965No. Calendar 22, Docket 50,637PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

{dissenting). Defendant Spadafore had had a class “C” liquor license in Pontiac from 1945 to 1963. His place of business was taken in condemnation proceedings and he had to find a new location. He leased property in a downtown building and secured the approval of the city commission for a transfer. His previous operation, according to the acting chief of police for the city, had been a good one. Plaintiffs, whose businesses are located in the same downtown area, brought this action for an injunction on the ground that approval by the city commission was contrary to State law.

Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morse v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  2. BOYS'CLUBS OF DETROIT v. PakulaMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. School District No. 3 v. Municipal Finance CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Skillman v. AbruzzoMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Wyoming Park Lumber & Fuel Co. v. Vander ArkMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Housing Authority v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Belanger v. Warren Consolidated School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Sandy Pines Wilderness Trails, Inc v. Salem TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Belanger v. Warren Consolidated School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Romain v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API