Harder v. Continental Printing & Playing Card Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, entered in favor of the plaintiffs upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.
The complaint alleges that between the 8th day of October, 1907, and the 8th day of February, 1908, plaintiffs, at the special instance and request of defendant, sold and delivered to the defendant goods, wares and merchandise of the reasonable and agreed value of $1,427.27, of which defendant has paid on account $400, leaving a balance due to plaintiffs from defendant of $3,027.27. The answer is a general denial. It appears that the goods were sold to one Buckham and delivered to bim at defendant’s place of business; and defendant claims that the goods were sold and delivered to Buckham…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McKyring v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Milbank v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Knapp v. . SimonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Brady v. HutkoffThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895
- Baker v. LoringNew York Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hansen v. BurfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Senor v. Bangor Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Studebaker Bros. v. R. M. Rose Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1909