Legal Opinion
In re Boter
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 25, 2007PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Richard Boter was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on December 11, 2000. At all times relevant to these proceedings, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
There are two unrelated disciplinary proceedings pending against respondent. The first is a “serious crime” proceeding commenced in July 2005 as a result of respondent’s guilty plea to a misdemeanor involving his unlawful solicitation of busi*3ness. The second proceeding involves 51 charges of…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- In re MuraskinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re SteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re BrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re RotterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re BoterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
4Cited by11 opinions
- In re IoannouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Carothers v. Insurance CompaniesCivil Court of the City of New York · 2009
- In re ZuberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re DrierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In Re SaghirDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.