Legal Opinion

In re Kaplan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 3, 2008PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent Leopold Kaplan was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on December 9, 1957. At all times relevant to these proceedings, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (i), (iii) and (iv) immediately suspending respondent from the practice of law based upon his lack of cooperation with the Committee, uncontested evidence of professional misconduct, and his willful failure or…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re MuraskinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. In re BenzingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. In re PapeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. In re RyansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. In re HestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re WarburghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. In re AuslanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. In re EngramAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. In re FletcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. In re KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API