Legal Opinion

Bauer v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 4, 1994No. C8-91-2302PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

In this case, we conclude that official immunity does not apply to a defamation action against public officials. We reverse and remand to the trial court.

Some facts and procedural background are necessary to put the issue on appeal in its proper setting. Plaintiff-respondent Sharon Y. Bauer was employed by the State of Minnesota at its Faribault Regional Treatment Center. She held the position of program plan coordinator for developmentally-disabled clients in the building where defendant-appellant Roger VanBuren was group supervisor and defendant-appellant Jane Ric-hert was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bahr v. Boise Cascade Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Bol v. ColeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit OperationsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Kellar v. VonHoltumCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Zutz v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API