Legal Opinion

Peek v. RESERVE NAT. INS. CO.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 9, 1991No. 1900055PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

585 So.2d 1303 (1991)

Rayburn PEEK and Eve Peek

v.

RESERVE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Lee Porter, Jr.

1900055.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 9, 1991.

Leila Hirayama of Johnson & Cory, Birmingham, for appellants.

Laura A. Woodruff of Maynard, Cooper, Frierson & Gale, Birmingham, for appellees.

2Per curiam

Rayburn and Eve Peek appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Reserve National Insurance Company and Lee Porter, Jr., in their action alleging breach of contract, bad faith refusal to pay an insurance claim, and misrepresentation.

On September 3, 1985, Lee Porter, Jr., as an agent for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Southern States Ford, Inc. v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Hicks v. Globe Life and Acc. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Elmore County Com'n v. RagonaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Simmons v. Congress Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Simmons v. Congress Life InsuranceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  4. US Diagnostic, Inc. v. Shelby Radiology, PCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Hyde v. Humana Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API