Legal Opinion

Hyde v. Humana Ins. Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 1, 1992No. 1902011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEAGALL, Justice.

John Hyde appeals from a summary judgment for the defendants, Humana Insurance Company, Inc. (“HIC”), and Huma-na, Inc., in his lawsuit alleging breach of contract, bad faith failure to pay an insurance claim, and the tort of outrage.

Hyde, a licensed agent with HIC who sold renewals of Medicare policies, was insured under a group medical insurance policy offered by HIC. That contract became effective on May 1, 1988, and contained a “Major Transplant Benefit Rider,” which provided, in pertinent part:

“MAJOR TRANSPLANT means pretran-splant, transplant and post-discharge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Principal Financial GroupSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Peek v. RESERVE NAT. INS. CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Webb v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Financial Ins. Co. v. TillerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Arnold v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API