Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 6, 1937No. 42129PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

In principle this case is like that of Bourne v. United States, 2 F.Supp. 228, 76 Ct.Cl. 680, and Jones, et al. v. United States, 5 F.Supp. 146, 78 Ct.Cl. 549. Compare Night Hawk Leasing Co. v. United States, 18 F.Supp. 938, 84 Ct.Cl. 596; American Cyanamid Co. v. United States, 4 F.Supp. 937, 78 Ct.Cl. 313. On the facts disclosed by the record, when considered in the light and in the manner in which they were considered and treated by the taxpayer and the Bureau of Internal Revenue, there was no fatal departure from the requirements of the statutes relating to claims for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Night Hawk Leasing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  2. Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  3. Bourne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  4. American Cyanamid Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. PierottiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  2. Neilson v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  3. McMahon v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1959
  4. Thrif-Tee, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1979
  5. Barclay v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API