Hoyt v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
LITTLETON, Judge.
In principle this case is like that of Bourne v. United States, 2 F.Supp. 228, 76 Ct.Cl. 680, and Jones, et al. v. United States, 5 F.Supp. 146, 78 Ct.Cl. 549. Compare Night Hawk Leasing Co. v. United States, 18 F.Supp. 938, 84 Ct.Cl. 596; American Cyanamid Co. v. United States, 4 F.Supp. 937, 78 Ct.Cl. 313. On the facts disclosed by the record, when considered in the light and in the manner in which they were considered and treated by the taxpayer and the Bureau of Internal Revenue, there was no fatal departure from the requirements of the statutes relating to claims for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Night Hawk Leasing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
- Bourne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
- American Cyanamid Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. PierottiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Neilson v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- McMahon v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1959
- Thrif-Tee, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1979
- Barclay v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947