Legal Opinion

Jones v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 4, 1933No. 41890PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Judge.

The plaintiffs are the surviving partners of Hallowell, Jones & Donald, a dissolved partnership. They seek in this suit to recover $75,772.89 excess profits tax paid by the partnership for the period from April 15, 1917, to December 31, 1917, together with interest thereon.

There is no controversy as to the facts, the parties having agreed upon them as they are set forth in the findings. The partnership excess profits tax liability for the period as disclosed by the tax return was $1,507,-628.38, of which amount $1,475,856.26 was paid on June 14, 1918, and the balance,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. United States v. Henry Prentiss & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. United States v. Factors & Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. McKesson & Robbins, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  5. Mobile Drug Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Cumberland Portland Cement Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  3. Pacific Mills v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934
  4. Stelco Holding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  5. Neilson v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API