Legal Opinion

Interphoto Corp. v. Minolta Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 29, 1969No. 69 Civ. 130PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BONSAL, District Judge.

Plaintiff Interphoto Corporation (Interphoto) moves pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 12(b) to dismiss the counterclaim contained in defendant Minolta Corporation’s (Minolta) amended answer on the grounds that it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and that the court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter.

Interphoto’s complaint, filed January 13, 1969, charges Minolta with violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2, and seeks damages and injunctive relief.

The complaint alleges that Interphoto, which distributes…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United Artists Corporation v. Masterpiece Productions, Inc., and Robert S. Benjamin, Arthur B. Krim, Seymour M. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  2. Interphoto Corporation v. Minolta CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  3. Bach v. QuiganDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1945
  4. Park Bridge Corp. v. EliasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  5. Aetna Life Ins. v. Little Rock Basket Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Cleveland v. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  2. Robert C. Springs v. First National Bank of Cut BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  3. Rodón v. Fernández FrancoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1976
  4. Chicago Freight Car Leasing Co. v. Martin Marietta Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
  5. Springs v. First National Bank of Cut BankDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API