Legal Opinion
Interphoto Corporation v. Minolta Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 30, 1969No. 69 Civ. 130PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERLANDS, District Judge:
Plaintiff, Interphoto Corporation (hereinafter “Interphoto”), moving for a preliminary injunction under 15 U.S.C. § 26, § 16 of the Clayton Act, seeks to restrain pendente lite defendant Minolta Corporation (hereinafter “Minolta”), its agents, servants, employees and those persons in active concert or participation with any of them (a) from refusing to sell Minolta photographic equipment to Interphoto, and (b) from terminating Interphoto’s distributorship of Minolta’s products. The gist of plaintiff’s charge is that Minolta is terminating Inter-photo’s…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Reuters Limited v. United Press International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Argus Incorporated and Interphoto Corporation v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- American Motor Inns, Inc. v. Holiday Inns, Inc., International Association of Holiday Inns, Intervenor-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- State v. Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Hobart Brothers Company v. Malcolm T. Gilliland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.