Legal Opinion

Bach v. Quigan

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 1, 1945No. 5326PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

Plaintiffs move to strike out the first and second counterclaims from defendants’ answer on the ground that they “fail to state a cause of action” against plaintiffs. As to the second counterclaim, the plaintiffs seek the alternative relief of an order requiring that it be made more definite and certain.

For the purposes of a motion to strike, no more is required of a counterclaim than of a complaint, and it is established in this circuit that under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 12 (b) (6), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, a pleading is sufficient…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bazemore v. BurnetCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Miner v. Commerce Oil Refining CorporationDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1961
  3. Salt Lake City v. Utah Lake Farmers AssociationUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Slaff v. SlaffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  5. Cyclotherm Corp. v. MillerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API