Legal Opinion

Norman E. Duquette, Inc. v. Commissioner

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 25, 2000No. Civ.A. 99-0580(PLF)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This case was brought by plaintiffs Norman E. Duquette and Norman E. Du-quette, Inc. (“NEDI”) under 26 U.S.C. §§ 6103 and 7431 of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 6103 prohibits the disclosure of tax returns and tax return information except as otherwise authorized by the Internal Revenue Code. Section 7431 creates a cause of action for damages for a taxpayer whose tax return or return information is disclosed in violation of Section 6103.

Plaintiffs Norman Duquette and NEDI assert that the Internal Revenue Service disclosed tax return information…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Abelein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Abelein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Bancroft Global Dev. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Emerging Money Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
  5. Bancroft Global Development v. KoskinenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API