Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Brown

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 25, 2009No. AC 29822PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

Claiming a violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., the plaintiff, Mary E. Sullivan, commenced this action against the defendants, Randy Brown, Randy Brown doing business as Clearwater Construction/Home Improvements and Clearwater Home Improvement, Inc. The defendants claim 1 that the court improperly determined that the plaintiff was entitled to a hearing on costs and attorney’s fees under General Statutes § 42-1 lOg (d) because she had not proven that she suffered an ascertainable loss as required by § 42-110g (a). Because…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Lone Star Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Paranteau v. DeVitaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Stuart v. StuartConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Burns v. General Motors Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Town of Ledyard v. WMS Gaming, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  2. Freeman v. A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  3. Bailey v. LanouConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. Hirschfeld v. MachinistConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  5. Ledyard v. WMS Gaming, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API