Legal Opinion

United States v. McFarland

District Court, D. Maine

Decided May 9, 2005No. CR-04-07-POPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON APPEAL

WOODCOCK, District Judge.

This appeal addresses the question of when a driver is in “actual physical, control” of his vehicle. Acting as an appellate court, this Court concludes there is sufficient evidence that the Defendant was in “actual physical control” of his vehicle to support a conviction of the misdemeanor charge of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence. This Court further concludes the Defendant was on fair notice his actions could constitute criminal conduct. This Court, therefore, AFFIRMS the Defendant’s conviction.

I. BACKGROUND

A. The Facts

On October…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. KozminskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. Shaun K. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. McFarlandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  2. Dukes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Lamore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  4. United States v. FosterDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2011
  5. United States v. ManciaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API