Legal Opinion

United States v. Mancia

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 21, 2010No. 2:07-cr-00241PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND ORDER REGARDING APPEAL FROM MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION

OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION.

Appellant Cochis Mancia (“Mancia”) was found guilty of violating 36 C.F.R. § 2.30(a)(1), which prohibits misappropriation of property, after a bench trial before a United States Magistrate Judge on August 29, 2007. Mancia appeals his conviction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3402. (Doc. 1). Appellant filed an opening brief on May 9, 2008. (Doc. 25). The United States filed its opening brief on December 19, 2008. (Doc. 30). Appellant filed a reply on April 10, 2009. (Doc.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Patton v. YountSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Edward CarranzaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nature v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API