Legal Opinion

In re Bailey

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 2000No. 99-BG-1248PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent Bailey was publicly reprimanded by the United States Court of Veterans Appeals now the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims on June 11, 1998. This sanction was the result of respondent’s failure to file a brief or otherwise to prosecute an appeal before that court, which resulted in dismissal of the appeal. Respondent also failed to communicate with his client and did not adequately respond to the court’s inquiry about his conduct. On August 24, 1999, the Supreme Court of Missouri issued a public reprimand in a reciprocal disciplinary proceeding.1

After Bar Counsel…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. In Re BellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re WatkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API