Legal Opinion

Marchi v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 30, 1980No. 79-2064PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA

The trial court dismissed a third-party complaint for indemnity on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action. This appeal questions the correctness of that order.

Plaintiff, Emily Marchi, brought the original action against defendants Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company, Rendell L. Byford, and Robert Kaiser. Plaintiff sought damages for injuries sustained when a vehicle in which she was a passenger collided with a train owned by Indiana Belt. Byford and Kaiser were engineer and conductor respectively, of the train involved. Defendants ther¿after filed a third-party complaint…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miller v. DeWittIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Muhlbauer v. KruzelIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Carver v. GrossmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Burke v. Sky Climber, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Moody v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sears v. Kois Bros. Equipment, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  2. Prange v. Kamar Construction Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. Stach v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API