Legal Opinion

Moody v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 14, 1974No. 57416PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goldberg

The problems which this appeal sets before us had their genesis when Blanche Moody (plaintiff) brought suit for personal injuries against Chicago Transit Authority (C.T.A.) and Silvercup Bakers, Inc. (Silver-cup). Silvercup filed a counterclaim against C.T.A. seeking indemnity on an active-passive theory. C.T.A. filed a counterclaim against Silvercup seeking indemnity upon the same theory, The entire matter was submitted to a jury without severance of the issues. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff against C.T.A. and Silvercup, awarding damages of $270,000. It answered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gertz v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Carver v. GrossmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Trzos v. Berman Leasing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  4. Gillette v. ToddAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  5. Topel v. PorterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. St. Joseph Hospital v. Corbetta Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  2. Richard v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. Johnson v. Hoover Water Well Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Robinson v. International Harvester Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Smith v. Clark Equipment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API