Legal Opinion

Hollander v. California Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 1996No. B080015PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.—

In this case we confront the question of whether a party who is both the secured creditor on a promissory note and a lessor of real property must give notice of sale to the guarantor of the note prior to selling collateral abandoned by the insolvent debtor/lessee when it vacated the leasehold. We agree with the trial court that failure to give notice precludes the creditor from seeking a deficiency judgment, and therefore affirm the judgment entered in favor of the guarantor.

Background

Appellant George Hollander owned and operated an aluminum finishing, anodizing,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Atlas Thrift Co. v. HoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Ford & Vlahos v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Rutan v. Summit Sports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Connolly v. Bank of Sonoma CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. C.I.T. Corp. v. Anwright Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cerritos Valley Bank v. StirlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API