Legal Opinion

State v. Davis/Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 4, 2004No. 00-12-39969, 00-12-39970 A116035 (Control), A116439PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendants, who were jointly tried as coperpetrators, appeal, raising 23 assignments of error. Twenty of those assignments — 10 by each defendant — challenge the trial court’s denial of motions for judgment of acquittal on various counts charging robbery in the first degree with a firearm, ORS 164.415, and robbery in the second degree with a firearm, ORS 164.405. As described below, we conclude that the trial court properly denied defendants’ motions for judgment of acquittal in that (1) the state presented legally sufficient evidence on each challenged count; and (2) assuming, without…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. BarrettOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. State v. DillmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. City of Portland v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. Andrew William BetnarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. BowersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. Davis/HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API