Legal Opinion

State v. Davis/Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 12, 2005No. 00-12-39969, 00-12-39970 A116035 (Control), A116439PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendants in these consolidated cases petition for reconsideration, arguing that we erred in rejecting their legal arguments concerning the number of convictions that should have been entered on multiple counts of robbery. State v. Davis/Hamilton, 194 Or App 382, 95 P3d 230 (2004). Defendant Hamilton also seeks reconsideration and asks this court to consider a supplemental assignment of error concerning the trial court’s imposition of an upward departure sentence under the sentencing guidelines on his conviction for attempted assault in the first degree with a firearm. He asserts that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. State v. DiltsOregon Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. Andrew William BetnarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. BowersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. GaymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API