Sengelaub v. Town of Smithtown
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtThomas P. Pauley, J.
In this taxpayer’s action pursuant to section 51 of the G-eneral Municipal Law, two motions are made by defendants to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. One motion is made on behalf of the Town Board of the Town of Smithtown and the other on behalf of defendant Brady. The remaining defendants in the action are Colonial Sand & Stone Co., Inc., hereinafter referred to as Colonial, and one Frank L. Kelly, an officer of that corporation.
The complaint alleges that on August 12, 1958, the town adopted a resolution to purchase approximately 28 acres of real property from Colonial for a price…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kaskel v. ImpellitteriNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Kalmanash v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Gerdes v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Altschul v. . LudwigNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Western New York Water Co. v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gaynor v. RockefellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Starburst Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1985