Legal Opinion

Gaynor v. Rockefeller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 21, 1964PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

Defendants appeal from so much of order entered December 12, 1963 as denied their respective cross motions to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that it fails to state a cause of action, and that the court has not jurisdiction *94of the subject matter, etc., pursuant to 3211 Civil Practice Law and Buies.

This is a class action for a declaratory judgment and an injunction, brought by four Negroes, citizens of the United States and residents of the State of New York, who have attempted unsuccessfully to gain admittance to certain of defendant union locals (herein unions) or to their…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. WRIGHT Et Al. v. ROCKEFELLER, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Railway Mail Assn. v. CorsiSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Broidrick v. LindsayNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Bald v. RCA ALASCOMAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Westphal v. Catch Ball Products Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  4. Mulroy v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. State Human Rights Appeal BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API