Tell v. Woodruff
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Woodruff from a judgment of the district court for St. Louis county, where the action was tried by Stearns, J.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, making the appellant, who also claimed a lien on the same premises, one of the defendants. This claim for a lien the appellant alleged in his answer. The court below refused to adjudge the amount found to be the value of appellant’s materials a lien on the property, but awarded him a simple judgment therefor. Although the counsel for the respondent argues several questions in his brief, *11we are of the opinion that there is but onewhich requires special notice. From the facts found, over which there was no controversy, it appears…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Frankoviz v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Nelson v. SykesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Phillips v. M. O. Mason & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilson v. SimonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
- Bardwell v. MannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- National Bank v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
- Groesbeck v. BargerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895
- Hill v. LovellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.