Nelson v. Sykes
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Hen-nepin county, Smith, J., presiding, overruling their demurrer to- the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.
The action is to foreclose a mechanic’s lien accruing between May 26. and June 10, 1889. The verified statement or claim for a lien was recorded November 13,1889. By the law in force when the lien accrued, the claimant had six months from the date of the last item within which to record the statement. By the mechanics’ lien law passed April 24, 1889, (Laws 1889, c. 200,) the *69claimantywas required'to have the statement recorded within 90 days from^tS^' date of the last item. The record in this case was within the 6} months, but not within the 90 days. By its terms the act of 1889\did not go…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Morrison v. MarchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bardwell v. MannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Tell v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Nystrom v. London & Northwest American Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Hill v. LovellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Hopkins v. Jamieson-Dixon Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895