Groesbeck v. Barger
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Memorandum. — Error from Smith district court; Cyrus Heren, judge. Action by W. F. Groesbeck and another against E. S. Barger and others, to enforce a mechanic’s lien. From the judgment plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Garver, J. :
The plaintiffs in error, W. F. Groesbeck and E. A. Belisle, under a sub-contract with the contractors, furnished material for the erection of a building of which defendants, E. S. Barger et al., were owners. The last of the materials was’furnished January 15, 1889. On the 20th day of May, 1889, a sworn statement of the lien claim was made and filed *62in the office of the clerk of the district court of Smith county, and a written notice of the filing of such lien served on the owners. This action was commenced on the 28th day of December,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Moore v. . MausertNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Goodbub v. Estate of HornungIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Weaver v. SellsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nixon v. Cydon Lodge No. 5Supreme Court of Kansas · 1896
- Owen Lumber Co. v. ChartrandSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Fossett v. Rock Island Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Vollmer Clearwater Co. v. Union Warehouse & Supply Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Bell v. HernandezSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.