Legal Opinion

Santiago v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 21, 1998PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

In 1996, a juvenile, Felix Santiago, was found delinquent by reason of murder in the first degree as well as other charges. In 1997, we reversed the juvenile’s adjudication of delinquency because of the prosecutor’s improper closing argument and ordered a new trial. Commonwealth v. Santiago, 425 Mass. 491 (1997) (Santiago I). Shortly thereafter, the juvenile, who had reached the age of nineteen, argued in the Juvenile Court that he had “aged out” of the Juvenile Court’s jurisdiction under the law as it existed at the time of his alleged offense. See G. L. c. 119, § 72 (1994 ed.) (providing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Commonwealth v. SantiagoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. GrandisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. BrunoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. DegroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API