Legal Opinion

Kim v. Nyce

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 2, 2011No. Civil Action 8:09-CV-01572-AWPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge.

Pending before the Court are Defendant Parcel K-Tudor Hall Farm, LLC (“PK-THF”)’s motion for summary judgment, Doc. No. 76, and Plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment, Doc. No. 79. The Court has reviewed the entire record with respect to the instant motions. The issues have been fully briefed and no hearing is deemed necessary. See D. MD. LOC. R. 105.6 (2010). For the reasons stated more fully below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion and DENIES Defendant’s motion.

I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The following facts are drawn…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Al-Sabah v. AgbodjogbeDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
  2. Ovrang v. MirghahariDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API