Legal Opinion

Root v. Hobbs Mfg. Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 24, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Circuit Judge.

Defendant has moved for a request hy this court to the Circuit Court of Appeals1 to recall and amend its mandate so that this court may have jurisdiction to reopen proofs, permit an amendment of an answer, and modify the decree.

I have considered and reconsidered affidavits and arguments at intervals, and have delayed a decision because of a reluctance, to take any judicial step which might not be fully reviewable.

But in my judgment I would not be justified in making the request unless I am satisfied, first, that the defendant has not been guilty of laches; and, second,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Brake & Electric Co. v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. In re Gamewell Fire-Alarm Tel. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1896
  3. Root v. Hobbs Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rome Grader & MacHinery Corp. v. J. D. Adams Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  2. Root v. John T. Robinson Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API