Sickles v. Herold
New York Supreme Court
Action by David B. Sickles, as receiver, against George Herold, on a promissory note. By stipulation of the parties, the cause was tried by the court without a jury. Judgment for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtPbyor, J.
The action is against the maker of a promissory note for $5,000, payable on demand to the order of the Harlem Biver Bank, and the case is this: In November, 1893, finding the Harlem Biver Bank reduced in its capital, the official examiner required the deficit to be promptly supplied by a payment of cash, or else he would not suffer the bank to open again. Thereupon, a negotiation *1084ensued between the examiner, on the one side, and the officers of the bank, on the other, in which defendant, as director, took part. The defendant and other officers were solicitous to avert the threatened closing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hamer v. . SidwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Rector, Etc. v. . TeedNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Hurd v. . KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Best v. . ThielNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Hun v. . SalterNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
3Cited by7 opinions
- German American State Bank v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Seth v. Lew HingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Looney v. BelcherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- General Electric Co. v. Nassau Electric RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Utley v. ClarkeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.