Hun v. . Salter
New York Court of Appeals
Thebe were two appeals in this action, one from a judgment of General Term affirming a judgment of Special Term, the other from an order of General Term affirming an order granting an extra allowance of costs to the plaintiff. The appeal from the judgment was decided on the opinion below. As to the appeal from the order the court say: “ Order giving extra allowance of costs to the plaintiff, and this we think should be sustained.
Read the full summary
Thebe were two appeals in this action, one from a judgment of General Term affirming a judgment of Special Term, the other from an order of General Term affirming an order granting an extra allowance of costs to the plaintiff. The appeal from the judgment was decided on the opinion below. As to the appeal from the order the court say: “ Order giving extra allowance of costs to the plaintiff, and this we think should be sustained. The place of trial was the ' county of Hew York, and the action was there tried and decided in February, 1881. It appears affirmatively that no application was made…
1Opinion of the Court
Danforth, J.,
reads for affirmance of judgment, and for reversal of order without prejudice to any further application to the Supreme Court in reference to the allowance, which plaintiff may be advised to make.
All concur.
Judgment and order accordingly.
2Cited by6 opinions
- State Bank v. KirkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Sickles v. HeroldNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Bear v. American Rapid Telegraph Co.New York Supreme Court · 1885
- Crandall & Godley Co. v. Eddy Confectionery Co.New York Supreme Court · 1902
- Lamaster v. KeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.