Legal Opinion

Home Fire Insurance v. Skoumal

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1897No. 8862PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the district court of Oass county. Tried below before Ramsey, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

This case has been submitted on an agreed printed abstract under rule two. It appears from the abstract that the case was begun in the county court, where judgment was rendered in favor of Skoumal, the plaintiff. It was taken by appeal to the district court, where judgment was again rendered for the plaintiff. The action was on a policy of fire insurance upon a dwelling house to the amount of $500, and upon personal property to the amount of $200. In defense of the action the insurance company pleaded that proofs of loss were furnished claiming a loss to the building of $337.10, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald ex rel. Stockholders of the Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. v. Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hanover Fire Insurance v. GustinNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Omaha Fire Insurance v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Closson v. RohmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Riter-Conley Mfg. Co. v. WrynSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Barrett v. Des Moines Mutual Hail & Cyclone InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. Grand Lodge Ancient Order United Workmen v. HigginsNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. O'Neill v. FloodNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API