Legal Opinion

Closson v. Rohman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1897No. 8047PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Tibbets, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

This case was submitted under that portion of rule 2, which provides that a cause may be submitted at any time upon a written stipulation of the parties on printed briefs accompanied by, or containing, an agreed printed abstract of the record and evidence upon which the case is to be determined. On examination it is found that the parties have complied with the rule only by printing in one of the briefs the agreed statement of facts upon which the case was determined in the district court. This statement refers to a chattel mortgage in controversy, which was evidently before the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. BarkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Home Fire Insurance v. SkoumalNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. North Platte Water-Works Co. v. City of North PlatteNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Shewell v. City of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Zink v. WesterveltNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API