Legal Opinion

Riter-Conley Mfg. Co. v. Wryn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 23, 1918No. 8187PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Action by Frank Wryn against the Riter-Conley Manufacturing Company, a corporation. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

This is an action brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error, to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by the plaintiff in error by reason that the defendant in error wrongfully and falsely failed to represent to him, at the time of his employment, that there were labor troubles, strikes, or lockouts at or around the place where the plaintiff was employed to work in Oklahoma, and $150 attorney’s fee.

Hereinafter the parties will he designated as they were in the trial court.

The evidence is voluminous, and we think that it is not necessary for…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. MettlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Larabee Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Biersach v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Oklahoma City v. SheldonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Robinson v. State Ex Rel. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Lawyer-Cuff Co. v. BlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API