Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. FINKELSTEIN

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 1959No. Appeals, 157 and 158PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

The defendants, Isaac Morshun and Phillip Finkelstein, were tried and convicted of the charge of accessory before and -after the fact to armed robbery. Finkelstein was also- convicted on the charge of receiving stolen goods. ■

Following the dismissal of motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment sentence was imposed. Both were sentenced to imprisonment on the first charge but sentence was suspended as to Finkelstein on the receiving of stolen goods charge. • Both defendants appealed from the judgment of sentence.

Albert LaMolinare, Charles Balazs and Donald Halt…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. PalarinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Commonwealth v. DarnellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. American Bank v. FelderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. DeSimone v. MaroneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RobsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. SisakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Commonwealth v. HassineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. State v. ReyesArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. ReyesArizona Supreme Court · 1965

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API