Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Teichmann

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1984No. A017682PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RACANELLI, P. J.

In this appeal we are asked to decide whether a spouse is entitled to interest on a community property award when payment is delayed without fault of the parties. We conclude that no legal basis exists for such entitlement, and we affirm the order after judgment striking cost bill.

Facts

The facts are presented by way of a settled statement:

Following a lengthy marriage the parties obtained an interlocutory judgment of dissolution under which terms husband was awarded a business partnership interest and profit sharing plan, and the family residence ordered sold with wife…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In Re Marriage of TammenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Wuest v. WuestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. In Re Marriage of SlaterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. In Re Marriage of HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dalgleish v. Selvaggio (In re Dalgleish), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Pollard v. PollardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Marriage of Dalgleish & SelvaggioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API