Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 18, 2002No. Nos. 19453-1-III; 20366-2-IIIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.

In unrelated prosecutions, Darin F. Williams and Joseph E. Tomaszychi pleaded guilty to controlled substance offenses. In both cases, the trial court imposed Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA) sentences over the State’s objection. The State appealed. We linked the cases due to common issues. We hold for the first time that the State may not appeal a DOSA sentencing as a matter of right under RAP 2.2(b)(6), but may seek discretionary review under RAP 2.3. Grounds do not exist to support discretionary review in either case. Accordingly, the DOSA sentencing in each case is affirmed.

FACTS

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. CastellanosWashington Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. A.M.R.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. BrammeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. State v. BrammeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API