Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AG
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAYNE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ (“Infineon”) Motion In Limine To Exclude Certain Documents (Docket No. 832) that Rambus, Inc. (“Rambus”) proposes to offer into evidence at the trial of this action. For the reasons set forth below, the motion in limine is granted.
FACTS AND BACKGROUND
Rambus filed this action in August 2000. Discovery in this case closed in January 2001. A trial was held in May 2001. The judgment was appealed, affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. On remand, Rambus and Infineon were accorded limited…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Charles COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.J. KIBORT and Educational Therapy Center, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Moreno L. Keplinger, Paul L. Wright, and James B. PlankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lorraine v. Markel American InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- United States v. SafavianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Donati v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Doali-Miller v. Supervalu, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- In RE McFADDENUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.