People v. Titoni
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
The assistant disciplinary counsel and the respondent entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. C.R.C.P. 241.18. An inquiry panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the conditional admission, including the recommendation that the respondent receive a pubhc censure. We accept the conditional admission and the recommendation.
I
The respondent was admitted to the Colorado bar in 1985, is registered as an attorney, and is subject to the jurisdiction of this court. According to the conditional admission, the respondent was retained by a woman and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. BergnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People v. PittamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- People v. KardokusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People v. RetrumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. BelschesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- People v. BonnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996