In re G.F.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Mother and father separately appeal from a judgment of the Orleans Family Court terminating their residual parental rights to minors G.F., G.F., and J.F. Mother contends the court improperly failed to: (1) make a finding required by the Indian Child Welfare Act; and (2) explore alternative disposition options to termination. Father joins in mother’s second claim, and also asserts that the court erroneously denied his request for appointment of counsel. We affirm.
¶2. The facts and procedural background may be briefly summarized. Additional facts will be set forth in the discussion which…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In re M.C.P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- In re L.A.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In re N.L., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- In The Interest of M.F.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Monroe County Department of Human Services v. Luis R.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- In Re Tamika R.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
- State v. Thomas Ferguson and Katherine A. FergusonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.