In The Interest of M.F.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Luckert, J.:
The biological mother of M.F. appeals a decision to terminate her parental rights, arguing the district court failed to comply with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq. (2006). The ICWA standard for termination of parental rights is “evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, including testimony of qualified expert witnesses, that the continued custody of the child by the parent or Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the child.” 25 U.S.C. § 1912(f) (2006). The mother argues the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Negonsott v. SamuelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Marcia v. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- Gaumer v. ROSSVILLE TRUCK AND TRACTOR CO.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- In re T.S.W.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- In the Interest of D.S.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.